<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ross millar &#187; sustainability</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.rdmillar.com/tag/sustainability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.rdmillar.com</link>
	<description>attempting to make pictures and write words.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 18:15:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>the cynic&#8217;s holiday</title>
		<link>http://blog.rdmillar.com/2008/01/01/the-cynics-holiday/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.rdmillar.com/2008/01/01/the-cynics-holiday/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 04:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ross millar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rdmillar.com/2008/01/01/the-cynics-holiday/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ve had your fill of clichés, they seem to come in heaps this time of year. I&#8217;ll spare us both the agony &#8211; this is a rant, you&#8217;ll find no holiday cheer in the following words. These words are no doubt off topic here, however, some of my favorite reading over the season [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ve had your fill of clichés, they seem to come in heaps this time of year. I&#8217;ll spare us both the agony &#8211; this is a rant, you&#8217;ll find no holiday cheer in the following words. These words are no doubt off topic here, however, some of my favorite reading over the season included <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/cp/Oddities/071222/K122204AU.html">the guy who nailed Santa to a cross</a>,  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christmas">Wikipedia&#8217;s article on Christmas</a>, and <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/most-memorable-quotes-of-2007-071231/">TorrentFreak’s Most Memorable Quotes of 2007</a>.  </p>
<p>The Christmas article helped me understand some of my dread towards the holiday. Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I think spending quality time with friends and family is great, but why do we need a skewed holiday in order for it to happen? What&#8217;s wrong with inviting a few loved ones around, swapping overpriced and underused consumables, creating some drama, overeating and getting shit-faced any other time of year? I for one enjoy a good New Years bash (for the holiday-stress relieving qualities), but the wastefulness of Christmas makes me want to puke a little, then again, that might be last night&#8217;s bash talking. Consider for a moment how many resources are wasted in powering all those horrid Christmas lights, let alone the waste in manufacturing, distributing, warehousing, and retailing the vomit inducing illuminations. Then there&#8217;s the unwanted gifts, the wrapping, excessive packaging, wasted food and drink, crackers with stupid hats, bad jokes and useless trinkets, lost time searching for the elusive Wii, and the poor, poor dead trees. I won&#8217;t get too far into the whole anti-consumer nor environmental thing &#8211; who <em>really</em> cares? </p>
<p>As for New Years Resolutions, I made one several years ago never to make any again, so far so good. If you think they work, may I suggest you make a resolution to see your Proctologist, he might find your head. Lifestyle choices are just that, make your choices and live them, don&#8217;t wait for the beginning of a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregorian_calendar">Roman invention</a> to alleviate your vices.</p>
<p>This post is a little late for the season, but I was far too busy living the cliché to find the time to write sooner. Here&#8217;s to a wasteful 2008 &#8211; the economy needs us, the environment does not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.rdmillar.com/2008/01/01/the-cynics-holiday/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>the problem with hybrids and EVs</title>
		<link>http://blog.rdmillar.com/2007/08/13/the-problem-with-hybrids-and-evs/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.rdmillar.com/2007/08/13/the-problem-with-hybrids-and-evs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ross millar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[automotive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rdmillar.com/2007/08/13/the-problem-with-hybrids-and-evs/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Electric Vehicles (EV) and Hybrids are promising technologies although still in their infancy. As a consumer, hybrids cannot be justified from a pure economic standpoint, take this Wired article I previously mentioned as an aside:
Hybrids can cost from $1,500 to $4,500 more than their gas-only equivalents. The new mileage estimates mean it will take longer [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Electric Vehicles (EV) and Hybrids are promising technologies although still in their infancy. As a consumer, hybrids cannot be justified from a pure economic standpoint, take this <a href="http://www.wired.com/cars/futuretransport/news/2007/05/hybrid_mpg" target="_blank">Wired article</a> I previously mentioned as an aside:</p>
<blockquote><p>Hybrids can cost from $1,500 to $4,500 more than their gas-only equivalents. The new mileage estimates mean it will take longer to recoup that extra cost in money saved on gas. Experts say the shift could dampen demand, although some hybrids will look better on paper than others.</p>
<p>According to a formula devised by Edmunds, it would take nearly 10 years to recoup the extra costs after buying a 2007 Mercury Mariner Hybrid, up from 6.6 according to the old mileage ratings. For the 2007 Honda Accord and Honda Civic hybrids it takes 14.5 and 6.5 years, respectively.</p></blockquote>
<p>Economically, it&#8217;s hard to justify the purchase of a hybrid, considering the average length of ownership is less than 10 years. Electric cars aren&#8217;t any better, worse in fact. Consider the cost of batteries in the <a href="http://www.time4.com/time4/microsites/popsci/futureofcars/tesla_p1.html">Tesla Roadster</a>. $20,000 &#8211; the cost of 6,831 Lithium Ion Lap Top Batteries. Hardly worth considering, with the exception of a specialty car, which is the approach Tesla has wisely taken. </p>
<p>What is needed is a serious R &#038; D effort to develop batteries for vehicle applications. Using power storage developed for mobile devices is expensive and ineffective. Using them as a platform for Electric vehicle development seems like a band aid approach to the problem. This is where <a href="http://www.technologyreview.com/Energy/19226/page1/">efforts like GM and A123 Systems</a> are so important. A123 has a Lithium Ion battery chemistry that is lighter, more compact and safer than conventional Li-Ion technologies. Now throw in some economy of scale and EV designers can stop using band aids.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.rdmillar.com/2007/08/13/the-problem-with-hybrids-and-evs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
